Alert: Export Control Check Required
Thank you for requesting a TWI Industrial Members Report.
To meet UK government requirements, your request will undergo an Export Control Check. This process reviews the technical content of the report, identifies the end user, and addresses any concerns.
Please submit your request to CRP@twi.co.uk including your name, member company that you work for and your location. We will contact you regarding the request within 2 working days and any additional information required to complete the necessary checks.
We look forward to receiving your request and processing it through our export control procedure.
Thank you,
TWI CRP Operations Team
This content is only available to Industrial Members, Find out how to become a Member of TWI.
TWI Industrial Member Report Summary 1093/2017
By Isabel Hadley
Background
TWI’s fracture test database includes details of an extensive programme of wide plate tests on both plain steel plates and welded joints, with and without application of a warm prestress (WPS). The R6 and BS 7910 fracture assessment procedures have developed since the tests were carried out, and the results provide an opportunity to validate various aspects of both procedures: not only the treatment of welding residual stress, but also the enhancement of fracture toughness due to WPS, the effect of weld strength overmatch and the treatment of plastic collapse.
Key Findings
- The transverse residual stress data for a butt-welded joint in a ferritic steel weld are reasonably represented by the upper bound curves given in BS 7910 and R6.
- The simple Level 1 model for residual stress relaxation under mechanical loading is a reasonable representation of the maximum value of transverse residual stress data obtained after WPS.
- The model for the enhancement of apparent fracture toughness after a WPS event is consistent with experimental results.
- Refinement of the treatment of residual stress from a simple Level 1 approach to a Level 3 approach allowed an almost threefold reduction in the value of Kr at failure.
- The initial estimate of Lr was reduced by a factor of around 1.3 once a revised global limit load solution was used, and the effects of mismatch taken into account.
- To date, all of the results associated with failure of the plate lie outside the default failure assessment line (FAL), so they support the fracture models in BS 7910 and R6.
- The effect of crack tip constraint on the fracture toughness of the weld metal is unknown; however, from the approach given in BS 7910 and R6 it was possible to draw up a series of hypothetical FALs for different levels of crack tip constraint.
Print version